|
architecturalrecord.com
April
1 , 2001
In
the Cause of Architecture
An
Online Journal of Ideas from Architectural Record
A new book by Anthony
M. Tung
Preservation has always had a movement, but never a history.
Anthony Tung, a former New York City Landmarks Commissioner, instructor
of architectural history, and lecturer on preservation around the
globe, has brought out a volume that is sure to become definitive
of the genre. Tung traveled to 22 cities across the world, ignoring
the fairly common bias to Western cities, and has chronicled their
history in this subtly instructive but never didactic volume.
Review by Kevin Lerner
Anthony Tung's Preserving
the World's Great Cities would be a worthwhile read if the only
brilliant observation it contained were Tung's simple explanation
of the layout of the London Underground system. As a New Yorker
who once lived, briefly, in London, I could never quite place what
it was about the Tube that seemed so much more convenient than the
more overtly rational New York City subway, where the major lines
follow aboveground streets. "It was a practical planning conception
of brilliance," Tung writes of the Underground, "creating
an underlying structural skeleton to a city that otherwise defied
attempts to give it a greater physical order.... The plan of the
Underground was the plan of important urban locations, not the plan
of important city streets." The London Underground defines
London, in other words; the New York subway merely echoes the city
above.
This particular observation,
as brilliant and as obvious in retrospect as the city planning decision
it illuminates, comes about three quarters of the way through Preserving
the World's Great Cities, at which point the reader has already
inhaled complete urban histories of Warsaw, Beijing, Moscow, Rome,
Cairo, Athens, Singapore, Amsterdam and Vienna. For the most part,
each city is given its own chapter, though cities that share themes
(Beijing and Moscow were both reshaped by Communist governments,
for instance) are occasionally covered together. And London, Paris,
Venice, New York, Kyoto, Berlin, Jerusalem and Charleston, South
Carolina are still to come. Tung's extraordinary accomplishment,
outside of anything that has strictly to do with preservation, is
to encapsulate so many urban histories in less than 500 pages. He
could almost have published the book without the title's first word,
and billed the thing as an urban studies textbook (which it will
no doubt become anyway, though for its comprehensive survey of preservation
history).
But that doesn't do the
book justice either, since it is so well written. Tung doesn't write
like an academic, though he obviously has the academic's grasp of
his material. His economy of language allows the history of a city
like Beijinga history that stretches from Mao all the way
back to Kublai Khanto come across clearly in just a few pages.
This is important, since for all its utility as an urban survey,
Preserving the World's Great Cities is ultimately about preservation.
Different cultures have found different ways to preserve their cities,
and for different reasons. This book gets to the root of the laws
that govern preservation; of the amazing will that led Varsovians
to document the landmarks of their city as Hitler was threatening,
and then to recreate them when he had been defeated; of the good
and bad effects of Communism's ideological identification with certain
types of architecture. Eight million stories in the naked city,
you say? How about that multiplied by 18 cities?
Tung has a good take
on the destructiveness of International Modernism, as well. He points
out that Modernist architecture was rarely drawn in its historical
context, but either unconnected to any context at all, or in an
EPCOT Center-like world that is completely composed of Modern design.
As Tung says, "the natural consequence of the wholesale reconception
of architecture seemed to be the complete remaking of the built
environment." This is another instance of Tung's ability to
take a complicated idea and render it in simple prose that makes
it seem as if it should have been abundantly clear to any intelligent
human being. And yet, he never condescends. This is a book not just
for academics or students or professional policy-makers, though
all of them would be well advised to pick up a copy. No, this book
is for any lover of cities or history. It is an epic, or rather,
18 little epics packed into one important book.
Return
to review index
|